仓库源文，站点原文

layout: post title: "NCE4-Lesson8仿写练习" date: 2014-11-27 21:02 comments: true

categories: 英语

仿写结果

tu2

总结

Chickens slaughtered in the United States, claim officials in Brussels, are not fit to grace European tables.

这个是经常使用的吸引人注意的开头倒装方式

These days, it is differences in national regulations, far more than tariffs, that put sand in the wheels of trade between rich countries. I

put sand in the wheels of表达出阻止，阻碍的含义

An electric razor that meets the European Union's safety standards must be approved by American testers before it can be sold in the United States, and an American-made dialysis machine needs the EU's okay before is hits the market in Europe.

be approved by American testers before it can be sold in the United States

needs the EU's okay before is hits the market in Europe

对么对称的表达同样意思而且不重复的表达方式？学习！

be sold = hit the market

be approved by = needs other's okay

One difficulty is to construct the agreements. The Americans would happily reach one accord on standards for medical devices and them hammer out different pacts covering, say, electronic goods and drug manufacturing. The EU -- following fine continental traditions -- wants agreement on general principles, which could be applied to many types of products and perhaps extended to other countries.

注意这段精彩的表述——如何先给出一个结论在，分别展开描述。在这里描写美国方面的时候使用了:reach one accord on, hammer out等动词生动活泼;欧洲这是一个插入语,following fine continental traditions,wants agreement on general principles　。注意又是一处，相同含义的不同表达。

背诵

Officials <del>of</del>->Chickens <del>Brussels</del>->slaughtered <del>claim</del>->in <del>that chicken killed in</del>->the United States, claim <del>is</del>->officials <del>not</del>->in <del>appropriate</del>->Brussels, are <del>for</del>->not <del>the</del>->fit <del>dinner</del>->to <del>table of</del>->grace European tables. <del>However</del>->No, say the <del>Americans</del>->American: our <del>declare that their chickens</del>->fowl are <del>good</del>->fine, we <del>and</del>->simply <del>the</del>->clean <del>only</del>->them <del>problem</del>->in <del>is that those chickens are proposed in</del>->a different <del>washing</del>->way. These <del>methods. Nowadays</del>->days, it is the differences <del>between</del>->in <del>different</del>->national <del>countries</del>->regulations, far <del>management</del>->more <del>rules</del>->than <del>not</del>->tariffs, that <del>the</del>->put <del>taxes</del>->sand <del>that barricade</del>->in the wheels of trade between <del>developed</del>->rich countries. <del>Not</del>->It <del>only</del>->is <del>are</del>->not <del>the</del>->just <del>famers</del>->farmers who are complaining. An electric razor <del>suited</del>->that meets the European Union's safety standards of Europe must be approved by <del>the</del>->American <del>US examining officials</del>->testers before it can be sold in <del>USA; still, dialysis</del>->the <del>machine</del>->United <del>produced</del>->States, and <del>by</del>->an American-made <del>should</del>->dialysis <del>be</del>->machine <del>approved</del>->needs <del>by</del>->the <del>Europe</del>->EU's okay before <del>it</del>->is <del>can enter</del>->hits the European market. A <del>happening</del>->in <del>safely</del>->Europe. As <del>used</del>->it <del>electric</del>->happens, a razor that is safe in Europe <del>may</del>->is <del>not</del>->unlikely <del>cause</del>->to <del>electrocutes</del>->electrocute <del>in</del>->Americans. So, ask <del>United</del>->businesses <del>States, so</del>->on <del>companies</del>->both <del>between</del>->sides of the Atlantic, why <del>are</del>->have <del>questioning</del>->two <del>when</del>->lots <del>one</del>->of <del>test</del>->tests <del>system</del>->where <del>can</del>->one <del>solve</del>->would <del>quality</del>->do? Politicians <del>problem</del>->agree, <del>why</del>->in <del>we</del>->principle, so <del>need</del>->America <del>two? General</del>->and <del>agreement of</del>->the <del>politicians</del>->EU <del>has</del>->have been <del>reached, so, United</del>->trying <del>States</del>->to <del>and</del>->reach <del>European</del>->a <del>Union</del>->deal <del>keep</del>->which <del>looking</del>->would <del>for</del>->eliminate <del>reaching</del>->the <del>some accords</del>->need to end the double<del> tests of</del>->-test many products. They hope to <del>reach</del>->finish <del>an</del>->in <del>agreement</del>->time <del>as</del>->for <del>soon</del>->a <del>as possible to prepare for the</del>->trade summit of trade between <del>United States</del>->America and <del>European</del>->the <del>Union which will be held</del>->EU on May <del>28.Altought</del>->28TH. Although <del>both sides of negotiation</del>->negotiators are optimistic<del> but </del>->, the <del>accord</del>->details <del>is</del>->are <del>so</del>->complex <del>complex</del>->enough that the difficult they <del>meet</del>->may <del>would</del>->be <del>probably</del>->hard-pressed <del>stop</del>->to <del>them</del>->get <del>from</del>->a <del>getting</del>->deal <del>accord. And</del>->at <del>why</del>->all. Why? One <del>problem</del>->difficulty is <del>drafting</del>->to <del>these</del>->construct <del>accords</del>->the agreements. The Americans <del>prefer</del>->would <del>to</del>->happily reach <del>a</del>->one <del>pact</del>->accord on <del>medical</del>->standards <del>instrument</del>->for <del>standards</del>->medical <del>firstly</del>->devices and <del>then</del>->them hammer out <del>other</del>->different pacts <del>for</del>->covering, say, electronic <del>including</del>->goods <del>something</del>->and <del>like</del>->drug <del>electronics and medicine</del>->manufacturing. <del>However, according</del>->The <del>to</del>->EU -- following <del>the long good</del>->fine continental <del>tradition , the</del>->traditions -- wants <del>European</del>->agreement <del>hope to reach a</del>->on general <del>rules</del>->principles, which <del>and these rules can</del>->could be applied to <del>different</del>->many <del>kinds</del>->types of products and <del>tended</del>->perhaps extended to other countries<del>. </del>->.